IBM misleads with use of term ’social innovation’
I have just made a complaint to IBM.
Dominic Campbell drew my attention to the way IBM uses the term ’social innovation’ on one of their websites and I too took exception to it. So I used their online contact form to send the following message. Let’s see if they respond.
Sir/Madam,
I am very concerned about the (deliberate?) misuse of the term ’social innovation’ on your website (http://tinyurl.com/5ykzgt).
In every other encounter I have had with it the term applies to strategies that strengthen civil society, NOT to the use of social technologies to further one’s business objectives (see Wikipedia: http://tinyurl.com/4znj6j).
I accept this may just be case [sic] of bad research, and not a deliberate attempt to mislead people into believing your motivation is for the public good rather than private profit.
Therefore I hope you take this issue seriously and review your use of the term.
I look forward to your response.
Yours faithfully,
Michael Grimes
Admittedly the Wikipedia definition does seem to allow for IBM’s use of the term:
“Over the years, the term has developed several overlapping meanings. It can be used to refer to social processes of innovation, such as open source methods.”
But I still maintain that it’s misleading and that they should change their terminology.
