<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizensheep &#187; newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/tag/newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizensheep.com/blog</link>
	<description>Michael Grimes lives in Birmingham (UK). This is his blog about anything that he fancies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:29:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another tuppence on why traditional media isn&#8217;t dead yet</title>
		<link>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just read on the cover of Metro that the details of Prince William&#8217;s wedding ceremony were released &#8216;exclusively on social networking site Twitter&#8217;. Even Clarence House is bypassing traditional news outlets; so are we finally seeing the demise of &#8216;traditional&#8217; media? No, probably not. The thing is I didn&#8217;t discover this news on Twitter. [...]<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/11/09/will-paid-for-news-create-a-new-underclass/" rel="bookmark">Will paid-for news create a new underclass?</a><!-- (18.5)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/09/10/what-works-for-dogs-in-social-media-doesnt-necessarily-work-for-citizens/" rel="bookmark">What works for dogs in social media doesn&#8217;t necessarily work for citizens</a><!-- (13.1)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/" rel="bookmark">Read All About It (In French)</a><!-- (12.4)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just read on the cover of Metro that the details of Prince William&#8217;s wedding ceremony were released &#8216;exclusively on social networking site Twitter&#8217;. Even Clarence House is bypassing traditional news outlets; so are we finally seeing the demise of &#8216;traditional&#8217; media? No, probably not.</p>
<p>The thing is I didn&#8217;t discover this news on Twitter. For a start I don&#8217;t follow Clarence House, because frankly I&#8217;m not that interested in them (and even if I did follow everyone I found interesting I wouldn&#8217;t have time left to breathe).</p>
<p>But I <em>am </em>interested in seeing a variety of news stories; if I read only the news I gather myself then I will only ever see what I want to, and never discover anything particularly new or challenging. Curated news is still king for me, be that online or in print (and I&#8217;ve yet to find an online newspaper lying discarded in a train carriage).</p>
<p>Also I need to feel confident that I&#8217;ll find at least <em>something </em>of interest, and I want it to be written well. That takes skill in both writing and editing, and at the moment it remains the professional media that instills in me the most confidence in those areas.</p>
<p>Anyway, you&#8217;ve probably read far too much hot air on this subject; and so I say goodnight.</p>
<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/11/09/will-paid-for-news-create-a-new-underclass/" rel="bookmark">Will paid-for news create a new underclass?</a><!-- (18.5)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/09/10/what-works-for-dogs-in-social-media-doesnt-necessarily-work-for-citizens/" rel="bookmark">What works for dogs in social media doesn&#8217;t necessarily work for citizens</a><!-- (13.1)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/" rel="bookmark">Read All About It (In French)</a><!-- (12.4)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A world without newspapers</title>
		<link>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sheep Dip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlinejournalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very good piece by David Schneiderman on the effect of the internet on journalism. I particularly like his &#039;Final Perspective&#039;, which I think applies to organisations acroos sectors: &#34;Many of the fundamental, underlying principles of effective public relations remain unchanged by this emerging world without newspapers. &#34;But make no mistake, the revolution is indeed [...]<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/" rel="bookmark">Read All About It (In French)</a><!-- (17.3)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/" rel="bookmark">Young people see the media as powerful but don&#8217;t trust it: particularly not the tabloids</a><!-- (9)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/08/30/smart-swarm/" rel="bookmark">Smart Swarm</a><!-- (7.9)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good piece by David Schneiderman on the effect of the internet on journalism. I particularly like his &#039;Final Perspective&#039;, which I think applies to organisations acroos sectors:</p>
<p>&quot;Many of the fundamental, underlying principles of effective public relations remain unchanged by this emerging world without newspapers.</p>
<p>&quot;But make no mistake, the revolution is indeed here.</p>
<p>&quot;And that fact makes it all the more imperative that every institution affected by this revolution not miss the boat in adapting its communications capabilities to this new reality.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/02/a_world_without_newspapers.html?ana=from_rss&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TechFlash+%28TechFlash+-+Seattle%27s+Technology+News+Source%29&amp;utm_content=Twitter" title="A world without newspapers">Visit <strong>A world without newspapers</strong></a></p>
<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/" rel="bookmark">Read All About It (In French)</a><!-- (17.3)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/" rel="bookmark">Young people see the media as powerful but don&#8217;t trust it: particularly not the tabloids</a><!-- (9)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/08/30/smart-swarm/" rel="bookmark">Smart Swarm</a><!-- (7.9)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young people see the media as powerful but don&#8217;t trust it: particularly not the tabloids</title>
		<link>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/</link>
		<comments>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship & civic engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenshipfoundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My professional life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tabloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mail and The Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouGov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizensheep.com/blog/?p=2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent research reveals that young people in the UK have little faith in journalists, but see them as having the greatest influence on government decisions. And tabloid journalists, it seems, are the worst of a bad bunch. The research was undertaken last week by online pollsters YouGov, on behalf of the Citizenship Foundation. Almost 4,000 [...]<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/11/30/young-people-dont-value-the-political-power-of-social-media-but-they-would-vote/" rel="bookmark">Young people don’t value the political power of social media, but they would vote</a><!-- (35.8)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/05/webaim-screen-reader-survey-results/" rel="bookmark">WebAIM: Screen Reader Survey Results</a><!-- (19)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/04/27/would-you-like-more-digital-engagement-knowledge-sharing-events/" rel="bookmark">Would you like more digital engagement knowledge-sharing events?</a><!-- (11.9)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent research reveals that young people in the UK have little faith in journalists, but see them as having the greatest influence on government decisions. And tabloid journalists, it seems, are the worst of a bad bunch.</p>
<p>The research was undertaken last week by online pollsters YouGov, on behalf of the <a href="http://citizenshipfoundation.org.uk/main/news.php?n765">Citizenship Foundation</a>. Almost 4,000 young people between 14 and 25 took part in the survey.</p>
<p>In answer to the question &#8216;How much, if at all, do you trust the following to tell the truth?&#8217;, journalists fared poorly. The scores for &#8216;little to no trust&#8217; make worrying reading:</p>
<table border="0" class="simple">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>TV news presenters and reporters</td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Journalists on ‘up-market’ papers<br />(eg The Guardian and The Times)</td>
<td>49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Journalists on local papers</td>
<td>56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Journalists on ‘mid-market’ papers <br />(eg The Mail and The Express)</td>
<td>81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Journalists on tabloid papers <br />(eg The Sun and The Mirror)</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Or do they? Is it in fact reassuring that The Sun isn&#8217;t trusted by its vast readership, or that newspapers don&#8217;t necessarily hold as much sway over the public as maybe we believe?</p>
<h4>Further information</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.yougov.co.uk/extranets/ygarchives/content/pdf/Citizenship_TOPLINES.pdf">Survey results summary (pdf)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.yougov.co.uk/extranets/ygarchives/content/pdf/Citizenship_FINAL.pdf">Full survey results (pdf)</a></li>
</ul>
<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/11/30/young-people-dont-value-the-political-power-of-social-media-but-they-would-vote/" rel="bookmark">Young people don’t value the political power of social media, but they would vote</a><!-- (35.8)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/05/webaim-screen-reader-survey-results/" rel="bookmark">WebAIM: Screen Reader Survey Results</a><!-- (19)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/04/27/would-you-like-more-digital-engagement-knowledge-sharing-events/" rel="bookmark">Would you like more digital engagement knowledge-sharing events?</a><!-- (11.9)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read All About It (In French)</title>
		<link>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/</link>
		<comments>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sheep Dip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>These are my links for 6 February 2009 from 10:12 to 10:12<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/" rel="bookmark">A world without newspapers</a><!-- (9.9)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/" rel="bookmark">Young people see the media as powerful but don&#8217;t trust it: particularly not the tabloids</a><!-- (9.2)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/" rel="bookmark">Yet another tuppence on why traditional media isn&#8217;t dead yet</a><!-- (7.7)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting piece by Jonathan Salem Baskin about the difference between online newspapers and traditional print-based ones. He argues that crowd-sourcing produces a consensus from a mix of opinion, not of facts; and that the media &#8216;conceptually, are aribiters of fact, if not truth&#8217;. I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m convinced, because even then &#8216;fact&#8217; is generally one person&#8217;s interpretation of it. But well worth a read.</p>
<p><a href="http://dimbulb.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/02/read-all-about-it-in-french.html">Visit <strong>Read All About It (In French)</strong></a></p>
<ul id="related_posts">
			<li>
					<h4>Possibly related posts</h4>
				 <ol>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2010/03/01/a-world-without-newspapers/" rel="bookmark">A world without newspapers</a><!-- (9.9)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/12/01/young-people-see-the-media-as-powerful-but-dont-trust-it-particularly-not-the-tabloids/" rel="bookmark">Young people see the media as powerful but don&#8217;t trust it: particularly not the tabloids</a><!-- (9.2)-->
							</li>
								<li>
									<a href="http://citizensheep.com/blog/2011/01/05/yet-another-tuppence-on-why-traditional-media-isnt-dead-yet/" rel="bookmark">Yet another tuppence on why traditional media isn&#8217;t dead yet</a><!-- (7.7)-->
							</li>
					</ol>
			</li>
	</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://citizensheep.com/blog/2009/02/06/read-all-about-it-in-french/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

